Wednesday, July 13, 2005
Putting Words in His Mouth
The inimitable Sarah Vowell, following in Kerry's footsteps of a couple weeks ago, offers her advice on "The Speech the President Should Give" about the war in Iraq, energy, the environment.
Carter's Presidential Library has the text of numerous speeches online, including -- yes -- the malaise one, and also all four State of the Unions. Although his reputation has certainly grown over the years, he's never been celebrated (as far as I know) for his soaring oratory, and maybe why that's why there aren't more transcripts available directly at the library site. But the ones that are there do make for good, inspiring reading.
For instance, there's this from the Democratic convention 29 years ago (and yes, I know that Presidential nomination acceptance speeches often promise much that can't possibly be delivered):
And finally, from his Farewell Address in January, 1981:
It does make me wonder. Sure, the world has changed a lot in the last 25-30 years. But while we still want and need and deserve -- as citizens -- honesty from those we've elected (even, or especially, if only barely elected), wouldn't it be nice to hear words of inspiration from time to time, too?
The only possible presidential speech fantasy in my wildest of daydreams, my oratorical castle in the air, is that one day, for just one measly speech, the president - the man of "mission accomplished," the man who was once asked at a press conference to discuss one of his mistakes and couldn't think of any, the man who is surely the sunniest looker-on-the-bright-side east of Drew Barrymore - would sit behind his Oval Office desk, stare into a TV camera and say: "My fellow Americans, good evening. As if that's possible."Then, in thinking about this speech which we will never hear from W's lips, she has an epiphany:
He continues, "We are a divided people, but let us celebrate what we have in common. We don't all worship the same god. Some of us do not believe in a god at all. But the good news is that, thanks to me, we all now believe in the Apocalypse. You're welcome."
Then I realized I was picturing George W. Bush giving this presidential bummer speech while wearing a cardigan sweater. Which is when it hit me. I was fantasizing about Jimmy Carter. I can stop whiling away the hours writing forlorn presidential speeches in my head and look up Carter's forlorn presidential speeches instead.Just about everybody remembers the Malaise Speech, even many of those who -- like Ms. Vowell -- were not even born, too young, or too otherwise occupied to actually hear it. I share with her the wish for something even vaguely honest to come out of W's mouth, and I appreciated her tipping me off about the Malaise Speech as an exemplar of what might be possible in that alternate universe. But I couldn't help wondering if she had to stop there.
Of course, my favorite is the famous "malaise" speech of 1979 (it deals with the energy crisis - but never actually uses the word malaise). Considered by some to be the worst presidential speech in history, the address asserted that our problems are "deeper than gasoline lines." And: "This is not a message of happiness or reassurance, but it is the truth and it is a warning." Then: "There is simply no way to avoid sacrifice."
Carter's Presidential Library has the text of numerous speeches online, including -- yes -- the malaise one, and also all four State of the Unions. Although his reputation has certainly grown over the years, he's never been celebrated (as far as I know) for his soaring oratory, and maybe why that's why there aren't more transcripts available directly at the library site. But the ones that are there do make for good, inspiring reading.
For instance, there's this from the Democratic convention 29 years ago (and yes, I know that Presidential nomination acceptance speeches often promise much that can't possibly be delivered):
We can have an America that has reconciled its economic needs with its desire for an environment that we can pass on with pride to the next generation.From the 1978 State of the Union:
We can have an America that provides excellence in education to my child and your child and every child.
We can have an America that encourages and takes pride in our ethnic diversity, our religious diversity, our cultural diversity—knowing that out of this pluralistic heritage has come the strength and the vitality and the creativity that has made us great and will keep us great.
We can have an American government that does not oppress or spy on its own people but respects our dignity and our privacy and our right to be let alone.
We can have an America where freedom, on the one hand, and equality, on the other hand, are mutually supportive and not in conflict, and where the dreams of our nation’s first leaders are fully realized in our own day and age.
And we can have an America which harnesses the idealism of the student, the compassion of a nurse or the social worker, the determination of a farmer, the wisdom of a teacher, the practicality of the business leader, the experience of the senior citizen, and the hope of a laborer to build a better life for us all. And we can have it, and we’re going to have it!
As I’ve said many times before, we can have an American President who does not govern with negativism and fear of the future, but with vigor and vision and aggressive leadership—a President who’s not isolated from the people, but who feels your pain and shares your dreams and takes his strength and his wisdom and his courage from you.
...even the best organized Government will only be as effective as the people who carry out its policies. For this reason, I consider civil service reform to be absolutely vital. Worked out with the civil servants themselves, this reorganization plan will restore the merit principle to a system which has grown into a bureaucratic maze. It will provide greater management flexibility and better rewards for better performance without compromising job security.
Then and only then can we have a government that is efficient, open, and truly worthy of our people's understanding and respect. I have promised that we will have such a government, and I intend to keep that promise.
In our foreign policy, the separation of people from government has been in the past a source of weakness and error. In a democratic system like ours, foreign policy decisions must be able to stand the test of public examination and public debate. If we make a mistake in this administration, it will be on the side of frankness and openness with the American people.
And finally, from his Farewell Address in January, 1981:
Good evening. In a few days, I will lay down my official responsibilities in this office -- to take up once more the only title in our democracy superior to that of president, the title of citizen."Idealism." "Wisdom." "Courage." "Frankness and openness." "Criticism and scrutiny of all government officials." "Dignity." Gee, remember those concepts?
[...]
These last four years have made me more certain than ever of the inner strength of our country -- the unchanging value of our principles and ideals, the stability of our political system, the ingenuity and the decency of our people.
Tonight I would like first to say a few words about this most special office, the presidency of the United States.
This is at once the most powerful office in the world -- and among the most severely constrained by law and custom. The president is given a broad responsibility to lead -- but cannot do so without the support and consent of the people, expressed informally through the Congress and informally in many ways through a whole range of public and private institutions.
This is as it should be. Within our system of government every American has a right and duty to help shape the future course of the United States.
Thoughtful criticism and close scrutiny of all government officials by the press and the public are an important part of our democratic society. Now as in our past, only the understanding and involvement of the people through full and open debate can help to avoid serious mistakes and assure the continued dignity and safety of the nation.
It does make me wonder. Sure, the world has changed a lot in the last 25-30 years. But while we still want and need and deserve -- as citizens -- honesty from those we've elected (even, or especially, if only barely elected), wouldn't it be nice to hear words of inspiration from time to time, too?