[Note: WLIR displays only 10 posts on the main page. All posts are accessible via the Archives.]

Thursday, July 07, 2005

 

Laughingly Called the "CPA"

Ghastly report, courtesy of the London Review of Books' Ed Harriman, about what, exactly, happened to all that money floating around post-invasion occupied Iraq. Just for starters:
The ‘reconstruction’ of Iraq is the largest American-led occupation programme since the Marshall Plan. But there is a difference: the US government funded the Marshall Plan whereas Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Bremer have made sure that the reconstruction of Iraq is paid for by the ‘liberated’ country, by the Iraqis themselves. There was $6 billion left over from the UN Oil for Food Programme, as well as sequestered and frozen assets, and revenue from resumed oil exports (at least $10 billion in the year following the invasion). Under Security Council Resolution 1483, passed on 22 May 2003, all of these funds were transferred into a new account held at the Federal Reserve Bank in New York, called the Development Fund for Iraq (DFI), so that they might be spent by the CPA ‘in a transparent manner . . . for the benefit of the Iraqi people’. Congress, it’s true, voted to spend $18.4 billion of US taxpayers’ money on the redevelopment of Iraq. But by 28 June last year, when Bremer left Baghdad two days early to avoid possible attack on the way to the airport, his CPA had spent up to $20 billion of Iraqi money, compared to $300 million of US funds.
The talk about "all that money" almost never mentions that the billions squirting out of the CPA firehose were the occupied country's own. On the face of it, this seems a good thing -- like the (post-Mission Accomplished) UN Resolution 1483 says, the money was to be spent for the good of the Iraqis themselves.

Heh. (That's Halliburton, KBR, and Bremer himself nudging you with their elbows.)

It's a long article, based on numerous sources (especially last year's GAO audit), but here are some highlights of the ways in which not just Iraqi, but US funds were misappropriated or unaccounted for:
I can't quote any more of this; it's just too disgusting. The whole affair ought to embarrass the sh!t out of anyone who claims we're in Iraq for noble purposes. It also ought to embarrass the sh!t out of anyone who likes to point to the UN Oil for Food "scandal" as evidence of larcenous intent. Lord knows it embarrasses me. If we don't see any indictments from any of this, whatever prosecutor has been put in charge should be next on the co-conspirators' list.


Comments: Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?